On Thu, Aug 21, 2025, at 1:53 AM, Claudio DeSouza via Boost wrote:
Your question appears to silently accept the premise that we interpret correctly what is happening, anyways.
My question certainly doesn't suggest that. I asked a question based on discussions in this thread for which I provided a quote, to which Vinnicius answered, but somehow you are sidestepping the conversation.
I said “your question” (not “you”) and “appears to accept” (not “accepts”). I didn’t assume it was what you intended. Yes, that was my subjective read, and it might be “wrong”.
All that you are doing is being hostile to anyone you perceive as an enemy in your head, without any engagement to what is being actually brought up, which in my case was less than nothing.
Well. Again it <appears> you are projecting. Also, you ignore the substantial, on-topic examples that I took time to write up. In case I misunderstood your intent, my apology. I don’t think your response was fair in any way. We can be civil even if we misunderstand - or even when people *are* hostile.
Claudio.