Thanks again for engaging. To clarify my objectives in this thread: 1. Explore AI’s role in research Use AI to help compile evidence on Boost libraries and their competitive landscape, always paired with human review and red-teaming. 2. Generate value for library authors Insights might help maintainers as they consider roadmaps, adoption strategies, or positioning relative to other work. 3. Prototype a repeatable workflow A cycle we can refine over time: - Evidence collection (gather sources, benchmarks, docs) - HITL curation (filter, annotate, prioritize) - Compilation & drafting (AI produces a first-pass narrative from curated sources) - Draft red-teaming (adversarial review to catch errors, weak claims, omissions) - Further HITL curation (reorganize, elevate, cut sections, guide re-drafts) - Finalization (executive summary last, human sign-off before publish) 4. Connect to Alliance / research-labs This is the umbrella where we’re running AI-first projects, with custom code as required for integration and experience. The JSON libraries pilot is just the first; the aim is to learn what kinds of briefs and comparisons are most useful to the community. 5. Surface ongoing signals Beyond one-off reports, there’s an opportunity to categorize discussion-board posts and repo PRs not only as news but also as metadata enrichment for other insight needs. Both streams could be valuable to Boost Libraries and could feed into promotional vehicles, keeping them evergreen and analytically richer. An afterthought: perhaps starting with a clearer introduction would have been better. It’s not my first rodeo with skepticism or resistance to AI-assisted tasks. But I’m learning from each effort — and it keeps this 35+ year solution architect young, and stretching just beyond the comfortable. On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 12:23 PM Arnaud Becheler <arnaud.becheler@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Sergio,
Thank you for your exploration. I do believe AI is useful, at least for me when I'm too tired to write proper english (or too irritated to have lean communication). I have not understood what your objective is in this thread. Would you mind rephrasing what you are trying to achieve?
Kind regards, Arno