15 Mar
2005
15 Mar
'05
1:05 a.m.
Eric Niebler wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote:
It's not that important, I was just curious. What's more important is that we don't seem to have a test case for the functionality. addressof_test is pretty basic.
Yes, that's an oversight on my part. I've attached a patch to addressof_test.cpp to test for taking the address of an array. I can confirm that these new tests pass with VC7.1 and gcc 3.3.3 (cygwin).
Great! Please go ahead and commit if you haven't already.