[boost] Re: [Review] Named parameters library

David Abrahams wrote:

I don't see why not. What am I missing? Anyway, it's surely possible to make a BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_MEMBER_FUN if neccessary.

I think it isn't working because the implementation function is declared twice in class body. So BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_MEMBER_FUN should drop the forward declaration. You'll probably also need a BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_CONST_MEMBER_FUN. I don't think there's a nice solution for constructors. Daniel