[boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT frowned up by core users

John Maddock wrote:

And isn't core C++11 anyway, so we could just use a real static_assert rather than a macro?

Not yet.

But for the avoidance of any doubt, I'm quite happy for StatcAssert to be moved to config.

But I also don't see a single rather tiny header as some kind of massive dependency which needs to be avoided via code duplication.

It's not the tiny header, but that you need an entire repository for it.