4 Jan
2006
4 Jan
'06
12:22 a.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
You can eliminate performance implications by using a deep-copying smart pointer like the cow_ptr, which I previously posted. Moreover, I wouldn't be surprise if the cow_ptr was able to out perform the boost pointer containers.
I would. COW doesn't have a good reputation.
I agree with Thorsten and will be interested in the results of the tests. I think the ptr_containers need more work, but I don't think they should be replaced because something might be better. If an alternative proves to be better and is adopted by people, the ptr_containers will not be used and will be a footnote in history. In the meantime I think the competition between approaches is interesting. Brian www.webEbenezer.net