I am endorsing on the following grounds. - Concepts like Containers and Data Structures are easy to grasp (unlike open-methods haha), and typically self-contained. They make a good "front of the window product" to appeal to new putative Boost users. - It's good to have an implementation before a feature makes it into the standard. It's even better to have two. Competition good! Helping the standard move in the right direction is a historic mission of Boost. - Joaquín has an excellent record on container libraries. J-L On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 3:18 PM Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hi,
I've been writing and benchmarking (candidate) boost::container::hub, a nearly drop-in replacement of C++26 std::hive that has excellent performance:
https://github.com/joaquintides/hub/blob/develop/README.md#performance
(The reason I didn't name it "hive" is because hub is not 100% conformant to std::hive spec, details at the repo linked above.)
Is there interest in having this in Boost? If so, please endorse the submission! As the codebase is fairly small (single 1800-LOC header), and due to the subject matter, my inclination is to propose it as part of Boost.Container rather than as a separate library.
Happy to discuss this proposal and its technical details. Looking forward to your feedback.
Best,
Joaquín M López Muñoz
_______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/6YXMHMAR...