7 Oct
2006
7 Oct
'06
12:38 a.m.
In-Reply-To: <45252C77.3050708@yar.nu> macke@yar.nu (Marcus Lindblom) wrote (abridged):
So, we need to support three different styles of access, at least, to make everyone happy?
- vec[0] - vec.x - vec[_x]
I won't be happy if vec.x is supported, no matter how many other styles of access we add. A class like this should not expose its representation so directly. (Not that my opinion should carry any weight; I'm just saying the conflict here is deeper than your message suggests.) -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK.