On 10 Mar 2011, at 09:00, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 10/03/2011 02:23, Chad Nelson wrote:
I will make the updated code available on request for anyone who wants to examine the changes.
512bit CoW, no Move: 0.48, 0.47, 0.47: 0.48 No CoW, no Move: 0.61, 0.61, 0.62: 0.61 (worst) No CoW, Move: 0.57, 0.57, 0.55: 0.56 CoW, Move: 0.44, 0.44, 0.44: 0.44 (best)
Review code, CoW, no Move: 0.50, 0.47, 0.47: 0.48
2Kbit CoW, no Move: 4.69, 4.79, 4.89: 4.79 (best) No CoW, no Move: 5.01, 5.19, 5.06: 5.09 (worst) No CoW, Move: 5.18, 5.00, 5.01: 5.06 CoW, Move: 4.80, 4.79, 4.86: 4.82
Review code, CoW, no Move: 4.88, 4.85, 4.94: 4.89
8Kbit CoW, no Move: 68.0, 68.8, 68.9: 68.6 No CoW, no Move: 70.4, 70.4, 70.2: 70.3 (worst) No CoW, Move: 70.9, 69.8, 69.6: 70.1 CoW, Move: 68.4, 68.2, 67.8: 68.1 (best)
Review code, CoW, no Move: 68.8, 68.4, 68.8: 68.7
In the move case, make your objects non-copiable to ensure you're not comparing oranges and apples.
Is that fair? Sometimes, people do want to make a copy of ints. Chris