Hi Eric, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 6/19/2013 10:59 PM, Nathan Crookston wrote:
Of course, I'd rather have BOOST_RESULT_OF_USE_TR1_WITH_DECLTYPE_FALLBACK defined automatically for compilers like VC10, g++4.5, etc.
So, why not? I haven't been following the discussion recently, but I seem to recall that we agreed to this at some point.
Daniel looked over the patch and suggested it would be best not to define the fallback mode by default. Here's the thread:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2013/04/202629.php I said I'd make a patch which follows his suggestion, but that I'd try to convince him to accept the first patch. I'll reiterate, I think it would be more surprising to have boost::result_of not work with compiler-supported lambdas than to have it correctly deduce results that would have been erroneous using TR1. Even though VC10's std::result_of didn't work with them either (for example). Thanks, Nate