On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 9:49 AM Matt Borland <matt@mattborland.com> wrote:
Will the questions on licensing be resolved before the review, before inclusion (if accepted)?
It is my understanding that Vinnie has contacted a lawyer with this question. More to follow on timelines. FWIW, the U.S. Copyright Office last month put out a report: "Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Part 2: Copyrightability"[1]. Their conclusion section (section V) is short and seems to answer the questions posed in this thread.
Matt
[1] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Co...
I was not aware of that report. Thank you for pointing it out. It does answer most questions (within the context of US copyright law). The conclusions in it do raise various constraints in LLM/AI generated code in Boost. The most challenging aspect is going to be complying with this determination "Human authors are entitled to copyright in their works of authorship that are perceptible in AI-generated outputs [cut]". Much to think about in this. -- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supongas Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net