Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?

AMDG Larry Evans wrote:

The times for all three implementations were all the same:

user: [and_seq_and_iter.o] 0.000016 system: [and_seq_and_iter.o] 0.000003

And this is where the vector size was BOOST_MPL_LIMIT_VECTOR_SIZE, which was 20.

I don't trust the timings produced by bjam. I know it doesn't work on windows, but I haven't looked at the unix implementation. Can you test something that you know takes a significant amount of time to compile? In Christ, Steven Watanabe