On Sun, Jun 29, 2025, 4:13 PM Richard Hodges via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
We only had a couple of reviews submitted for boost::sqlite.
The decision therefore was to issue a statement that the review results were inconclusive, perhaps to be tabled another time?
I think inconclusive only works if you schedule another review period as review manager - of the same review that is. With another manager, it would need to be another review, hence a reject on this one. That will depend on whether or not you will be in a better position timewise to manage the review.
I had intended to issue a message to this effect but have been snowed under over the past few months.
Mea culpa
R
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 17:19, Scott Bailey <Scott@thebaileyfamily.org> wrote:
Are there next steps for boost::sqlite? Or is it dead?
I'd really like to see something like this.
Scott Bailey
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 11:49 AM Scott Bailey <Scott@thebaileyfamily.org> wrote:
Hi All,
What was the result of this review?
TY, Scott Bailey
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 6:30 AM Richard Hodges via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Dear All,
Surprise!
The Boost formal review of the Boost SQLITE library starts *TODAY*, taking place
from November 13th, 2024 to November 22nd, 2024 (inclusive).
I apologise profusely for springing this on you without prior warning. The error is entirely mine. I am extending the period by one day to compensate.
The library is authored by Klemens Morgenstern (@klemens-morgenstern in the CppLang slack).
Documentation: https://klemens.dev/sqlite/ <https://anarthal.github.io/mysql/index.html> Source: https://github.com/klemens-morgenstern/sqlite <https://github.com/anarthal/mysql/>
From the documentation:
boost.sqlite is a simple to use C++ sqlite library. It provides a modern interface using facilities like error_code, views (e.g. for blobs) and the ability to use boost.describe or boost.pfr for parameterised queries.
Supported features include:
- typed queries - prepared statements - json support - custom functions (scalar, aggregate, windows) - event hooks - virtual tables
SQLite provides an excellent C-API, so this library does not attempt to hide, but to augment it.
Please provide in your review information you think is valuable to explain your choice to ACCEPT or REJECT including SQLITE as a Boost library. Please be explicit about your decision (ACCEPT or REJECT).
Some other questions you might want to consider answering:
- Will the library bring additional out-of-the-box utility to Boost? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - Will the choice of API abstraction model ease the development of software that must talk to a SQLITE database? - Are there any immediate improvements that could be made after acceptance, if acceptance should happen? - Did you try to use the library? With which compiler(s)? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
More information about the Boost Formal Review Process can be found at: http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html
The review is open to anyone who is prepared to put in the work of evaluating and reviewing the library. Prior experience in contributing to Boost reviews is not a requirement.
Thank you for your efforts in the Boost community. They are very much appreciated.
Richard Hodges - review manager of the proposed Boost.SQLITE library
Klemens is often available on CppLang Slack and of course by email should you require any clarification not covered by the documentation, as am I.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/A6TQTBYW...