I can see changes being committed to branch `develop`. I do not think this is desirable. I think the shape of the library (source code, docs) should remain frozen for the time of the review. All the reviewers need to be able to look at and talk about the same thing. Either provide a branch dedicated for the review, or refrain from doing changes to `develop` during the review period.
The only changes have been for clarity: you asked for an improved error message, and someone on Reddit asked for clarification on underflow/overflow of constructors to be added to the Docs. I'm fine with freezing the branch, but I thought it would make sense to address clarity issues along the way so they don't confuse potentially multiple reviewers when it could be dealt with on the spot. Matt