Re: [boost] [iterator] generator_iterator vs. function_input_iterator

Andrey Semashev wrote:

There seems to be two nearly equivalent components in Boost.Iterator: generator_iterator (moved from Boost.Utility) and function_input_iterator.

`function_input_iterator`'s implementation looks better than that of `generator_iterator`. However, the name of the former is not appealing. "generate" is a standard word to Range enthusiasts -- it is used like `generate(non_pure_func) | take(10)`. Thus, I would like to deprecate `generator_iterator` first and then rename `function_input_iterator` to `generator_iterator`. Regards, Michel