Re: [boost] [scope_guard] New revision available + naming consideration

David Abrahams wrote:

Another thought:

g = 0;

it's easy to arrange that only a literal zero works there.

How?

I don't love it, but maybe it will get your ideas flowing.

Something like: g = guard::inactive; g = guard::active; or maybe g = guard::dismissed; g = !guard::dismissed; (ugh) ? Overloading operators here may be a bit counter-intuitive.