[boost] Re: boost::function feature request?

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:

Of course f = t; is merely a shorthand way of spelling f = boost::lambda::constant(t), but a dependency on lambda isn't always desirable.

Thoughts?

By the same token, one could argue that this functionality ought to be pushed into boost::bind. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com