30 Jul
2017
30 Jul
'17
2:51 a.m.
Raffi Enficiaud wrote:
Hi,
For some libraries that are using boost.test, it seems that boost.test is included in the weight. But this is in fact not totally true: as it is shown, it is a "developer" weight that wants to run the tests and compile the doc.
The dependencies in the report are computed based on the headers in `include`. If one of them includes a Boost.Test header, Test is considered a dependency. The usual practice is to move such private headers to the `test` subdirectory.
Would it be somehow possible to account only for the source code that generates the libraries, as seen by users?
This would imply that header-only libraries have no dependencies, which is absurd.