On 16 Mar 2026 20:51, Matt Borland via Boost wrote:
Bottom Line Up Front: The library is conditionally accepted. Thank you again to everyone who participated in the review.
For transparency, the final tally of ACCEPT/CONDITIONAL ACCEPT/REJECT, from both private and public reviews, was 1/5/2. Both rejections and nearly all conditional acceptance conditions revolved around the state of the documentation and naming. I have consolidated these conditions and related discussion on the GitHub issue tracker, rather than reiterating them here.
The review result should be posted here on the ML, including all conditions that are formally required to be met for the library to get accepted. In particular, this serves as a reference point in future discussions. Please, do this. You can create issues and PRs as a consequence of the review to simplify tracking the progress in getting the conditions fulfilled, but these issues and PRs do not constitute the formal review result.