It did outperform O2, so that would make sense. I am fine with O3.

--
Sent with mail.com Mail app


On 4/4/26, 2:57 AM "Jakob Lövhall via Boost" <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
> Dear Boost C++ community,
>
> StatSort function for fast sorting is ready to be reviewed / commented on, etc.
> https://github.com/drpt78/statsort
>
> Questions:
>
> Q1: Is statsort suitable for Boost C++ Library?
>
> Q2: What optiomization you usually use -O2 or -O3 and why?
>
> Q3: What is missing?
>
> Q4: What is wrong?
> Best,
> Peter

tend to use O3 because its a higher number than O2, so it feels like it would be better.
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org
To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/DQGOL7EFDHAWIQ5MFBI4IF4FZS3PGPS2/