22 Mar
2005
22 Mar
'05
4:35 a.m.
In-Reply-To: <d1na66$6p2$1@sea.gmane.org> daniel@calamity.org.uk (Daniel James) wrote (abridged):
5. change implementation of hash values for pointers so undefined behavior is gone (and consider adding x + (x >> 3) )
I'm going to do that.
Is it worth considering using x + x / sizeof(*p) instead? -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK