Em sex., 15 de ago. de 2025 às 16:36, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> escreveu:
We might want design changes which help other Boost libraries interoperate yet conflict with his vision. All of this is solved with our own fork of Asio.
If it's going to be a new library with a new design, it should go through the Boost peer review process. I don't know if your idea is going to be sufficiently different to warrant a new library that's mostly going to be an overlap of what Boost.Asio already does though. I'll chime in later with more points. In the meantime, is it my impression or am I the only person who still uses the mailing list asio-users? What should be the alternative for asio-users? Boost-develop or boost-users? I've been developing macros for Boost.Asio, and if they ever get in a state where I think they might be useful to other people, I was planning on announcing it in asio-users. -- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://vinipsmaker.github.io/