On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 3:13 AM Artyom Beilis via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
why do you think another maintainer will do the better job. The discussion should be how to help improve code and documentation of ASIO when the author is busy?
It would be paid C++ Alliance staff, and any volunteers (if there are any). The difference here is the guarantee of responsiveness. For example, look at this beautiful table explaining the type requirements for ConstBufferSequence: https://boost.org/doc/libs/1_65_0/doc/html/boost_asio/reference/ConstBufferS... And now look at the newer version: https://boost.org/doc/libs/1_66_0/doc/html/boost_asio/reference/ConstBufferS... One can no longer figure out how to meet the type requirements based on these "improved" docs. This page is objectively worse and we have no path for fixing it. Thanks