Re: [boost] [proto-implementation]why proto::arg##N vs. mpl::vector##N

On 4/18/07, Eric Niebler <eric@boost-consulting.com> wrote:

Larry Evans wrote:

...

Hi, Eric.

Could you tell me why isn't mpl::vector##N reused instead of proto::arg##N, which, AFAICT, is almost the same?

Because compile times improved by ~10% when I made the switch.

Were those changes something MPL could use without breaking existing code? If so, would you see benefit to reusing mpl::vector##N? --Michael Fawcett