[boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT frowned up by core users

Andrey Semashev wrote:

If timing is not essential then let's do it the right way and save everyone from the deprecation of BOOST_CORE_STATIC_ASSERT. Let's revert the addition of BOOST_CORE_STATIC_ASSERT...

If that's the consensus, then sure, I'll delete static_assert.qbk and rename the macro to BOOST_CORE_DETAIL_STATIC_ASSERT. We already did that for core::string_view, why not do it again, the procedure has been a smashing success and of enormous benefit to everyone.