18 Nov
2025
18 Nov
'25
1:35 a.m.
On Nov 14, 2025, at 12:16 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The diff alone may give the impression that this is a high risk change, but it essentially restores the 1.89 behavior on Clang, so it shouldn't be.
That was certainly my first impression. If you’re happy with the test results, go ahead. — Marshall