[boost] Re: Reflections on accuracy in AI-assisted reviews

Is this valuable during the review? I would argue no. The giant AI generated post read like a relatively standard competitive analysis.

I agree, this should be either in the documentation, or in the RM’s email of review announcement (in a much shorter form). I do not think such AI product should be part of individual review for the simple reason that if it’s easily generated, then each reviewer using AI is at risk at obfuscating the discussion with redundant information :) So maybe there is a hint here for discouraging/banning use of AI for reviewers. Kind regards, Arno