21 Nov
2007
21 Nov
'07
2:38 a.m.
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
In fact I think that fusion should provide function objects for every one of its algorithm. That used to be the case at one point. I'll re-consider this again. I'll second the motion.
Ok. I'll do it after 1.35 is branched. What's a good subnamespace to put that in? We already have result_of::xxx.
fusion::functional ? -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com