Am 10.09.2025 um 17:48 schrieb Vinnie Falco:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 8:46 AM Daniela Engert <dani@ngrt.de> wrote:
What's really bugging me is the use of BOOST_CONSTEXPR_OR_CONST at namespace scope in header files.
Should we get pull requests opened to all the libraries that use BOOST_CONSTEXPR_OR_CONST to replace them with BOOST_INLINE_CONSTEXPR?
May be. For *my* in-house distribution of 1.89, I have given - Boost.Accumulators - Boost.Container - Boost.Move - Boost.Parameter this kind of treatment, or had to handle entities in anonymous namespaces with the same effect. I didn't look into all libraries, only the ones that we use in our company. Hence, I have only 71 libraries in my module 'Boost'. Dani -- PGP/GPG: 2CCB 3ECB 0954 5CD3 B0DB 6AA0 BA03 56A1 2C4638C5