3 Apr
2018
3 Apr
'18
4:06 p.m.
On 2 April 2018 at 20:30, Gavin Lambert via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 30/03/2018 07:48, Andrey Semashev wrote:
Difficulty with one particular IDE does not count as a valid reason to stick with 32-bit x86 to me.
While the above is true, having the most popular compiler and IDE of the platform default to 32-bit does argue very strongly to *not stop* building 32-bit by default _on Windows_.
This might not stay this way! It also departs from the assumption that *all* VS users are total numwitz, and do not attempt and succeed to set up and select a 64-bit project. degski