[optional] regression failures on Linux teeks
Hello all, I see the following Boost.Option regression test failures on develop branch: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/optional.html === error 1 === Test output: teeks99-02-dc3.7-14-Docker-64on64 - optional - optional_test_conversions_from_U / clang-gnu-linux-3.7~c++14 Rev 05c2033df7b99d19f4939bf81ca2aeeec592993d / Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:24:42 +0000 Compile [2017-11-03 01:39:15 UTC]: fail "clang++-3.7" -c -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++14 -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -g -fPIC -m64 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.test/clang-gnu-linux-3.7~c++14/debug/threadapi-pthread/optional_test_conversions_from_U.o" "../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp" In file included from ../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp:12: In file included from ../boost/optional/optional.hpp:64: ../boost/optional/detail/optional_config.hpp:152:48: error: expected value in expression # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_GCC, >= 50000) && ^ 1 error generated. === error 2 === Test output: teeks99-02-dc5-1z-lc-Docker-64on64 - optional - optional_test_conversions_from_U / clang-gnu-linux-5.0~c++1z~lc Rev 420dd51fb237f5e75cae0aeb01ec427717e4a748 / Sat, 04 Nov 2017 15:00:43 +0000 Compile [2017-11-04 15:49:56 UTC]: fail "clang++-5.0" -c -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -isystem/usr/include/libcxxabi -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -g -fPIC -m64 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.test/clang-gnu-linux-5.0~c++1z~lc/debug/threadapi-pthread/optional_test_conversions_from_U.o" "../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp" In file included from ../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp:18: In file included from ../boost/core/lightweight_test.hpp:25: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/iostream:38: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/ios:216: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:15: /usr/include/c++/v1/string:1942:14: error: expected ';' at end of declaration _NOEXCEPT ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string:1947:9: error: expected unqualified-id _NOEXCEPT ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:368:21: note: expanded from macro '_NOEXCEPT' # define _NOEXCEPT noexcept ^ 2 errors generated. === The first error only shows on develop, the second error shows up on both develop and master regression tests. Do you know what the issue is on this toolset/platform? I am asking because Boost.Contract uses Boost.Option so it is showing the same failures. Thank you. --Lorenzo
Hi Lorenzo, Issue 1 is a bug in the implementation of Optional that I introduced a couple of days ago. This has been now reverted, but we will still see the error reports for the next couple of days in the test matrix. Issue 2 seems to be the communication problem between the compiler and the standard library, but I do not know anything specific. Regards, &rzej; 2017-11-05 2:02 GMT+01:00 Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> :
Hello all,
I see the following Boost.Option regression test failures on develop branch: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/optional.html
=== error 1 ===
Test output: teeks99-02-dc3.7-14-Docker-64on64 - optional - optional_test_conversions_from_U / clang-gnu-linux-3.7~c++14 Rev 05c2033df7b99d19f4939bf81ca2aeeec592993d / Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:24:42 +0000 Compile [2017-11-03 01:39:15 UTC]: fail
"clang++-3.7" -c -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++14 -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -g -fPIC -m64 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/optional/test/ optional_test_conversions_from_U.test/clang-gnu-linux-3. 7~c++14/debug/threadapi-pthread/optional_test_conversions_from_U.o" "../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp"
In file included from ../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp:12: In file included from ../boost/optional/optional.hpp:64: ../boost/optional/detail/optional_config.hpp:152:48: error: expected value in expression # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_GCC, >= 50000) && ^ 1 error generated.
=== error 2 ===
Test output: teeks99-02-dc5-1z-lc-Docker-64on64 - optional - optional_test_conversions_from_U / clang-gnu-linux-5.0~c++1z~lc Rev 420dd51fb237f5e75cae0aeb01ec427717e4a748 / Sat, 04 Nov 2017 15:00:43 +0000 Compile [2017-11-04 15:49:56 UTC]: fail
"clang++-5.0" -c -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -isystem/usr/include/libcxxabi -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -g -fPIC -m64 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/optional/test/ optional_test_conversions_from_U.test/clang-gnu-linux-5. 0~c++1z~lc/debug/threadapi-pthread/optional_test_conversions_from_U.o" "../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp"
In file included from ../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp:18: In file included from ../boost/core/lightweight_test.hpp:25: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/iostream:38: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/ios:216: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:15: /usr/include/c++/v1/string:1942:14: error: expected ';' at end of declaration _NOEXCEPT ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string:1947:9: error: expected unqualified-id _NOEXCEPT ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:368:21: note: expanded from macro '_NOEXCEPT' # define _NOEXCEPT noexcept ^ 2 errors generated.
===
The first error only shows on develop, the second error shows up on both develop and master regression tests.
Do you know what the issue is on this toolset/platform?
I am asking because Boost.Contract uses Boost.Option so it is showing the same failures.
Thank you. --Lorenzo
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
On 5 November 2017 at 13:10, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hi Lorenzo, Issue 1 is a bug in the implementation of Optional that I introduced a couple of days ago. This has been now reverted, but we will still see the error reports for the next couple of days in the test matrix. Issue 2 seems to be the communication problem between the compiler and the standard library, but I do not know anything specific.
FWIW I'm getting an error on the develop branch using g++ 4.4 in C++0x mode: ../../boost/optional/optional.hpp:954: error: ‘boost::optional<T>::optional(boost::optional<T>&&)’ cannot be defaulted ../../boost/optional/optional.hpp:1031: error: ‘boost::optional<T>& boost::optional<T>::operator=(boost::optional<T>&&)’ cannot be defaulted g++ 4.6 doesn't have this issue.
2017-11-05 19:54 GMT+01:00 Daniel James via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org>:
On 5 November 2017 at 13:10, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hi Lorenzo, Issue 1 is a bug in the implementation of Optional that I introduced a couple of days ago. This has been now reverted, but we will still see the error reports for the next couple of days in the test matrix. Issue 2 seems to be the communication problem between the compiler and the standard library, but I do not know anything specific.
FWIW I'm getting an error on the develop branch using g++ 4.4 in C++0x mode:
../../boost/optional/optional.hpp:954: error: ‘boost::optional<T>::optional(boost::optional<T>&&)’ cannot be defaulted ../../boost/optional/optional.hpp:1031: error: ‘boost::optional<T>& boost::optional<T>::operator=(boost::optional<T>&&)’ cannot be defaulted
g++ 4.6 doesn't have this issue
Thanks! Apparently, this is the second compiler (in addition to MSVC 12) to expose this property: defaulted functions work in general but not with move operations. I will fix it, but ideally it should be fixed in Boost.Config. Regards, &rzej;
Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Apparently, this is the second compiler (in addition to MSVC 12) to expose this property: defaulted functions work in general but not with move operations. I will fix it, but ideally it should be fixed in Boost.Config.
As I mentioned last time, this is because defaulted functions were added to the standard before generated move functions (and hence, support for the former is in gcc 4.4, the latter are in 4.6.)
On 6 November 2017 at 07:54, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Thanks! Apparently, this is the second compiler (in addition to MSVC 12) to expose this property: defaulted functions work in general but not with move operations. I will fix it, but ideally it should be fixed in Boost.Config.
Thanks for fixing it.
Hello Andrzej & all, On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Issue 1 is a bug in the implementation of Optional that I introduced a couple of days ago. This has been now reverted, but we will still see the error reports for the next couple of days in the test matrix. Issue 2 seems to be the communication problem between the compiler and the standard library, but I do not know anything specific.
It looks like these couple of issues with Boost.Optional development regression tests were all fixed. I don't see these errors in Boost.Contract regression tests anymore. Thanks a lot! --Lorenzo
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hello all,
I see the following Boost.Option regression test failures on develop branch: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/optional.html
=== error 1 ===
Test output: teeks99-02-dc3.7-14-Docker-64on64 - optional - optional_test_conversions_from_U / clang-gnu-linux-3.7~c++14 Rev 05c2033df7b99d19f4939bf81ca2aeeec592993d / Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:24:42 +0000 Compile [2017-11-03 01:39:15 UTC]: fail
"clang++-3.7" -c -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++14 -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -g -fPIC -m64 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/optional/test/ optional_test_conversions_from_U.test/clang-gnu-linux-3. 7~c++14/debug/threadapi-pthread/optional_test_conversions_from_U.o" "../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp"
In file included from ../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp:12: In file included from ../boost/optional/optional.hpp:64: ../boost/optional/detail/optional_config.hpp:152:48: error: expected value in expression # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_GCC, >= 50000) && ^ 1 error generated.
=== error 2 ===
Test output: teeks99-02-dc5-1z-lc-Docker-64on64 - optional - optional_test_conversions_from_U / clang-gnu-linux-5.0~c++1z~lc Rev 420dd51fb237f5e75cae0aeb01ec427717e4a748 / Sat, 04 Nov 2017 15:00:43 +0000 Compile [2017-11-04 15:49:56 UTC]: fail
"clang++-5.0" -c -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -isystem/usr/include/libcxxabi -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -g -fPIC -m64 -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/optional/test/ optional_test_conversions_from_U.test/clang-gnu-linux-5. 0~c++1z~lc/debug/threadapi-pthread/optional_test_conversions_from_U.o" "../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp"
In file included from ../libs/optional/test/optional_test_conversions_from_U.cpp:18: In file included from ../boost/core/lightweight_test.hpp:25: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/iostream:38: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/ios:216: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:15: /usr/include/c++/v1/string:1942:14: error: expected ';' at end of declaration _NOEXCEPT ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string:1947:9: error: expected unqualified-id _NOEXCEPT ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:368:21: note: expanded from macro '_NOEXCEPT' # define _NOEXCEPT noexcept ^ 2 errors generated.
===
The first error only shows on develop, the second error shows up on both develop and master regression tests.
Do you know what the issue is on this toolset/platform?
I am asking because Boost.Contract uses Boost.Option so it is showing the same failures.
Thank you. --Lorenzo
It seems like there are a lot of failures in the teeks99-02-dc5-1z-lc-Docker-64on64 (clang 5, -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++) that aren't in the teeks99-02-dc5-1z-Docker-64on64 (clang 5, -std=c++1z)...and that is the only config that uses libc++, so I'm guessing it is an issue with the libc++ install on that docker image. I'll look at it when I get a chance...if anyone else has experience setting up libc++ on ubuntu I'd be happy to take a pull request for the docker image or command arguments: https://github.com/teeks99/boost-cpp-docker/tree/master/clang-5 https://github.com/teeks99/boost-build/tree/master/Regression Tom
participants (5)
-
Andrzej Krzemienski -
Daniel James -
Lorenzo Caminiti -
Peter Dimov -
Tom Kent