Jason is getting MARRIED!
My JSON library is going to propose to Boost soon, is there anyone who might be willing and able to function in the role of review manager? Thanks!
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 19:09, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
My JSON library is going to propose to Boost soon, is there anyone who might be willing and able to function in the role of review manager?
Great idea. Once again you’re serving the needs of c++ enthusiasts who value utility. Thank you. I’m probably not qualified to engage in review but I wanted to offer my support. This is a great compliment to beast when writing c++ programs that must interface with node et al. Something I do a lot of. Until now I have used nlohmann because it’s easy. If this library is as easy but more efficient, then we all win.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Richard Hodges hodges.r@gmail.com office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212
On 11/17/19 3:52 PM, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 19:09, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I’m probably not qualified to engage in review
LOL - of course you're qualified. We always need more reviewers who actually have some real world experience using similar libraries.
This is a great compliment to beast when writing c++ programs that must interface with node et al. Something I do a lot of.
Until now I have used nlohmann because it’s easy.
Right - we can always reviews from people who know what it means for something to be easy.
If this library is as easy but more efficient, then we all win.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:53 PM Richard Hodges <hodges.r@gmail.com> wrote:
I’m probably not qualified to engage in review
Actually quite the opposite, you would be an ideal reviewer because your current use-case uses JSON and you would be in the best position to report on the extent to which Boost.JSON fulfills that current need. Thanks!
OK, I'll make some time (somehow) to retrofit it into liquid's market data distribution code. We have good timing metrics in that plant, and it's battle-hardened in production. On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 01:21, Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:53 PM Richard Hodges <hodges.r@gmail.com> wrote:
I’m probably not qualified to engage in review
Actually quite the opposite, you would be an ideal reviewer because your current use-case uses JSON and you would be in the best position to report on the extent to which Boost.JSON fulfills that current need.
Thanks!
-- Richard Hodges hodges.r@gmail.com office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212
participants (3)
-
Richard Hodges -
Robert Ramey -
Vinnie Falco