Hi all, my name is Steve Gerbino. I'm one of the principal architects of Corosio and a co-author of P4003: IoAwaitables, A Coroutine-Only Framework. My background is in systems programming, FinTech, and blockchain infrastructure. I'm excited to be part of the Boost community and look forward to contributing and meeting you all. STEVE GERBINO The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.
On 3 Mar 2026 20:52, Steve Gerbino via Boost wrote:
Hi all, my name is Steve Gerbino. I'm one of the principal architects of Corosio and a co-author of P4003: IoAwaitables, A Coroutine-Only Framework. My background is in systems programming, FinTech, and blockchain infrastructure. I'm excited to be part of the Boost community and look forward to contributing and meeting you all.
STEVE GERBINO
The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.
Hello, Steve. Welcome to the Boost ML. Please, be sure to read the Discussion Policy[1], in particular the part about avoiding email footers. [1]: https://www.boost.org/doc/user-guide/discussion-policy.html
In article <GKz8RpoqibPY5aNb-yTYW7TNVAc_fPi8yLiJMjTw23pqepHMMiotfltBCPZA6I322NQXHmRFK375yfmnyKixbvvv_aF5bxjOBy-o9WQc1q0=@gerbino.co>, "Steve Gerbino via Boost" <boost@lists.boost.org> writes:
Hi all, my name is Steve Gerbino. [...]
Welcome, Steve! I am really looking forward to doing more with capy and corosio. This electronic mail transmission and any attachments are intended solely for the designated recipient or for the person currently pretending to be the designated recipient, and may contain confidential, proprietary, privileged, semi-privileged, dramatically privileged, or mildly embarrassing information belonging to the sender, the sender's affiliates, the sender's affiliates' accountants, and possibly that one coworker who still believes the cultural high point of civilization occurred sometime between the final season of Friends and the week everyone collectively debated Brad Pitt's hairstyle, and by opening this message you acknowledge, agree, affirm, and silently nod that any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, copying, printing, forwarding, screenshotting, or dramatic reenactment of the contents herein is strictly prohibited unless you are fully prepared to engage in a detailed analysis of whether Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie represented true compatibility or merely two impeccably symmetrical headlines sharing the same orbit of paparazzi attention, which our compliance department insists is not an official corporate position but which nevertheless arises during budget meetings with unsettling frequency, and furthermore if you are not the intended recipient you must immediately notify the sender, delete this message from your inbox, outbox, drafts folder, archived folder, cloud storage, external drive labeled Totally Not Gossip, and any printed copy concealed beneath a binder of quarterly projections, because the material contained herein may reference not only the cinematic gravitas of Mr. Pitt and the humanitarian reputation of Ms. Jolie but also the intellectual gravitas of John von Neumann whose contributions to computing architecture quietly support the very devices upon which celebrity updates are consumed, and it may further mention Donald Knuth who in a more orderly universe would have produced a multi volume treatise titled The Art of Celebrity Analysis complete with impeccably typeset footnotes and algorithmic breakdowns of red carpet probability distributions, and possibly Guy L. Steele who would insist that if one must gossip one should at least design a language expressive enough to macro expand a rumor into a fully formed narrative with syntactic elegance, which leads us inevitably and with corporate inevitability to the subject of programming language superiority because it is the official yet unofficial sentiment of this communication that LISP remains superior to all other programming languages on the entirely objective basis that code and data are treated identically, thereby enabling a level of metaprogrammatic introspection that mirrors the way the public treats celebrity interviews as both narrative and raw material for additional narrative, and while this analogy has not been reviewed by a standards committee it has been vigorously debated near the office vending machine, and you are hereby advised that any attempt to translate the spirit of this disclaimer into a language lacking homoiconicity may result in semantic drift, reduced expressiveness, and an inexplicable urge to rewatch late 90s sketch comedy for emotional calibration, and by continuing to read you certify that you understand this disclaimer may expand, contract, recursively redefine its own scope, self interpret, and possibly refactor itself in a manner consistent with symbolic expression evaluation, that you accept that references to Angelina Jolie's philanthropic efforts do not constitute legal advice, that references to Brad Pitt's filmography do not constitute investment guidance, that invocations of von Neumann do not imply endorsement by any academic institution bearing his legacy, that admiration for Knuth does not obligate you to submit your next status report in literate programming format, that mention of Steele does not require you to implement a new language standard before lunch, that speculation about 90s celebrity dynamics should not be entered into evidence in any court of law or family group chat, that you waive the right to claim confusion arising from abrupt transitions between Hollywood rumor and computational theory, that you acknowledge this message may contain forward looking statements regarding both software paradigms and hypothetical reunion tours, that such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, fluctuating public opinion, and unexpected hairstyle revisions, that redistribution of this message without express written consent may result in mandatory attendance at a seminar titled Homoiconicity and Hollywood A Compliance Perspective, and that in summary but not in brevity this communication is confidential, privileged, structurally recursive, mildly preoccupied with 90s celebrity lore, academically respectful of foundational computer scientists, unwavering in its assessment of LISP's conceptual elegance, and intended solely for the recipient capable of appreciating that sometimes the most secure form of corporate communication is one so elaborately digressive that no reasonable person would dare forward it. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>
On Thu, Mar 5, 2026, 7:31 AM Richard via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
In article <GKz8RpoqibPY5aNb-yTYW7TNVAc_fPi8yLiJMjTw23pqepHMMiotfltBCPZA6I322NQXHmRFK375yfmnyKixbvvv_aF5bxjOBy-o9WQc1q0=@ gerbino.co>, "Steve Gerbino via Boost" <boost@lists.boost.org> writes:
Hi all, my name is Steve Gerbino. [...]
Welcome, Steve! I am really looking forward to doing more with capy and corosio.
This electronic mail transmission and any attachments are intended solely for the designated recipient or for the person currently pretending to be the designated recipient, and may contain confidential, proprietary, privileged, semi-privileged, dramatically privileged, or mildly embarrassing information belonging to the sender, the sender's affiliates, the sender's affiliates' accountants, and possibly that one coworker who still believes the cultural high point of civilization occurred sometime between the final season of Friends and the week everyone collectively debated Brad Pitt's hairstyle, and by opening this message you acknowledge, agree, affirm, and silently nod that any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, copying, printing, forwarding, screenshotting, or dramatic reenactment of the contents herein is strictly prohibited unless you are fully prepared to engage in a detailed analysis of whether Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie represented true compatibility or merely two impeccably symmetrical headlines sharing the same orbit of paparazzi attention, which our compliance department insists is not an official corporate position but which nevertheless arises during budget meetings with unsettling frequency, and furthermore if you are not the intended recipient you must immediately notify the sender, delete this message from your inbox, outbox, drafts folder, archived folder, cloud storage, external drive labeled Totally Not Gossip, and any printed copy concealed beneath a binder of quarterly projections, because the material contained herein may reference not only the cinematic gravitas of Mr. Pitt and the humanitarian reputation of Ms. Jolie but also the intellectual gravitas of John von Neumann whose contributions to computing architecture quietly support the very devices upon which celebrity updates are consumed, and it may further mention Donald Knuth who in a more orderly universe would have produced a multi volume treatise titled The Art of Celebrity Analysis complete with impeccably typeset footnotes and algorithmic breakdowns of red carpet probability distributions, and possibly Guy L. Steele who would insist that if one must gossip one should at least design a language expressive enough to macro expand a rumor into a fully formed narrative with syntactic elegance, which leads us inevitably and with corporate inevitability to the subject of programming language superiority because it is the official yet unofficial sentiment of this communication that LISP remains superior to all other programming languages on the entirely objective basis that code and data are treated identically, thereby enabling a level of metaprogrammatic introspection that mirrors the way the public treats celebrity interviews as both narrative and raw material for additional narrative, and while this analogy has not been reviewed by a standards committee it has been vigorously debated near the office vending machine, and you are hereby advised that any attempt to translate the spirit of this disclaimer into a language lacking homoiconicity may result in semantic drift, reduced expressiveness, and an inexplicable urge to rewatch late 90s sketch comedy for emotional calibration, and by continuing to read you certify that you understand this disclaimer may expand, contract, recursively redefine its own scope, self interpret, and possibly refactor itself in a manner consistent with symbolic expression evaluation, that you accept that references to Angelina Jolie's philanthropic efforts do not constitute legal advice, that references to Brad Pitt's filmography do not constitute investment guidance, that invocations of von Neumann do not imply endorsement by any academic institution bearing his legacy, that admiration for Knuth does not obligate you to submit your next status report in literate programming format, that mention of Steele does not require you to implement a new language standard before lunch, that speculation about 90s celebrity dynamics should not be entered into evidence in any court of law or family group chat, that you waive the right to claim confusion arising from abrupt transitions between Hollywood rumor and computational theory, that you acknowledge this message may contain forward looking statements regarding both software paradigms and hypothetical reunion tours, that such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, fluctuating public opinion, and unexpected hairstyle revisions, that redistribution of this message without express written consent may result in mandatory attendance at a seminar titled Homoiconicity and Hollywood A Compliance Perspective, and that in summary but not in brevity this communication is confidential, privileged, structurally recursive, mildly preoccupied with 90s celebrity lore, academically respectful of foundational computer scientists, unwavering in its assessment of LISP's conceptual elegance, and intended solely for the recipient capable of appreciating that sometimes the most secure form of corporate communication is one so elaborately digressive that no reasonable person would dare forward it.
Emails sent to the mailing lists will end up in many inboxes & trigger phone notifications Please consider the relevancy of your message before hitting send, otherwise people might just tune out the ML. I for one did not fine one message in this thread relevant. Smalltalk can be done on slack.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 4:02 PM Klemens Morgenstern via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I for one did not fine one message in this thread relevant.
And it came to pass, in the days when the lists grew silent and the volume of mailings was exceedingly low, that the elders rose up and spoke unto the people, saying: "Thou shalt make small talk among thy brethren, that the lists may not perish from disuse. Thou shalt adorn thy messages with footers and signatures of great length and majesty, yea, even unto many lines. But hear me, O ye who dwell upon the lists, and tremble: THOU SHALT NOT TOP POST. For this is an abomination before the threading, and whosoever doeth so shall be cast out from the digest, and their replies shall be as chaff before the moderator."
Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> spake the secret code <CAGT5OKMoDu2=9Nab3r291d3-t20ALr7e_kMoL9nH8Dw5P+z7fg@mail.gmail.com> thusly:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2026, 7:31 AM Richard via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
In article
<GKz8RpoqibPY5aNb-yTYW7TNVAc_fPi8yLiJMjTw23pqepHMMiotfltBCPZA6I322NQXHmRFK375yfmnyKixbvvv_aF5bxjOBy-o9WQc1q0=@>> gerbino.co>,
"Steve Gerbino via Boost" <boost@lists.boost.org> writes:
Hi all, my name is Steve Gerbino. [...]
Welcome, Steve! I am really looking forward to doing more with capy and corosio.
This electronic mail transmission and any attachments are intended solely for the designated recipient or for the person currently pretending to be the designated recipient, and may contain confidential, proprietary, privileged, semi-privileged, dramatically privileged, or mildly embarrassing information belonging to the sender, the sender's affiliates, the sender's affiliates' accountants, and possibly that one coworker who still believes the cultural high point of civilization occurred sometime between the final season of Friends and the week everyone collectively debated Brad Pitt's hairstyle, and by opening this message you acknowledge, agree, affirm, and silently nod that any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, copying, printing, forwarding, screenshotting, or dramatic reenactment of the contents herein is strictly prohibited unless you are fully prepared to engage in a detailed analysis of whether Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie represented true compatibility or merely two impeccably symmetrical headlines sharing the same orbit of paparazzi attention, which our compliance department insists is not an official corporate position but which nevertheless arises during budget meetings with unsettling frequency, and furthermore if you are not the intended recipient you must immediately notify the sender, delete this message from your inbox, outbox, drafts folder, archived folder, cloud storage, external drive labeled Totally Not Gossip, and any printed copy concealed beneath a binder of quarterly projections, because the material contained herein may reference not only the cinematic gravitas of Mr. Pitt and the humanitarian reputation of Ms. Jolie but also the intellectual gravitas of John von Neumann whose contributions to computing architecture quietly support the very devices upon which celebrity updates are consumed, and it may further mention Donald Knuth who in a more orderly universe would have produced a multi volume treatise titled The Art of Celebrity Analysis complete with impeccably typeset footnotes and algorithmic breakdowns of red carpet probability distributions, and possibly Guy L. Steele who would insist that if one must gossip one should at least design a language expressive enough to macro expand a rumor into a fully formed narrative with syntactic elegance, which leads us inevitably and with corporate inevitability to the subject of programming language superiority because it is the official yet unofficial sentiment of this communication that LISP remains superior to all other programming languages on the entirely objective basis that code and data are treated identically, thereby enabling a level of metaprogrammatic introspection that mirrors the way the public treats celebrity interviews as both narrative and raw material for additional narrative, and while this analogy has not been reviewed by a standards committee it has been vigorously debated near the office vending machine, and you are hereby advised that any attempt to translate the spirit of this disclaimer into a language lacking homoiconicity may result in semantic drift, reduced expressiveness, and an inexplicable urge to rewatch late 90s sketch comedy for emotional calibration, and by continuing to read you certify that you understand this disclaimer may expand, contract, recursively redefine its own scope, self interpret, and possibly refactor itself in a manner consistent with symbolic expression evaluation, that you accept that references to Angelina Jolie's philanthropic efforts do not constitute legal advice, that references to Brad Pitt's filmography do not constitute investment guidance, that invocations of von Neumann do not imply endorsement by any academic institution bearing his legacy, that admiration for Knuth does not obligate you to submit your next status report in literate programming format, that mention of Steele does not require you to implement a new language standard before lunch, that speculation about 90s celebrity dynamics should not be entered into evidence in any court of law or family group chat, that you waive the right to claim confusion arising from abrupt transitions between Hollywood rumor and computational theory, that you acknowledge this message may contain forward looking statements regarding both software paradigms and hypothetical reunion tours, that such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, fluctuating public opinion, and unexpected hairstyle revisions, that redistribution of this message without express written consent may result in mandatory attendance at a seminar titled Homoiconicity and Hollywood A Compliance Perspective, and that in summary but not in brevity this communication is confidential, privileged, structurally recursive, mildly preoccupied with 90s celebrity lore, academically respectful of foundational computer scientists, unwavering in its assessment of LISP's conceptual elegance, and intended solely for the recipient capable of appreciating that sometimes the most secure form of corporate communication is one so elaborately digressive that no reasonable person would dare forward it.
Emails sent to the mailing lists will end up in many inboxes & trigger phone notifications
Please consider the relevancy of your message before hitting send, otherwise people might just tune out the ML.
I for one did not fine one message in this thread relevant. Smalltalk can be done on slack.
Noted! The public humiliations will continue until this list becomes fun again. Got it. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
participants (6)
-
Amlal El Mahrouss -
Andrey Semashev -
Klemens Morgenstern -
Richard -
Steve Gerbino -
Vinnie Falco