Ticket #637 - Adjusts mpl::pair concept to be compatible with STL pairs
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/637 Is this feature request still sensible or does fusion make this useless somehow ? If not, I can provide patch+test -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
AMDG Joel Falcou wrote:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/637
Is this feature request still sensible or does fusion make this useless somehow ?
If not, I can provide patch+test
It looks like there were patches which got lost when we moved to trac/svn. Anyway, 1) This is not a widely needed feature. 2) Breaking backwards compatibility is out of the question, IMO. 3) Preserving backwards compatibility increases the compile time cost of using mpl::pair. In Christ, Steven Watanabe
Steven Watanabe wrote:
It looks like there were patches which got lost when we moved to trac/svn. Anyway, Oh ?
1) This is not a widely needed feature. 2) Breaking backwards compatibility is out of the question, IMO. 3) Preserving backwards compatibility increases the compile time cost of using mpl::pair.
So should we close this as wontfix ? -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
on Mon Jun 01 2009, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou-AT-u-psud.fr> wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
It looks like there were patches which got lost when we moved to trac/svn. Anyway, Oh ?
1) This is not a widely needed feature. 2) Breaking backwards compatibility is out of the question, IMO. 3) Preserving backwards compatibility increases the compile time cost of using mpl::pair.
So should we close this as wontfix ?
I guess that's up to Aleksey? -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:08:03 -0500, David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
on Mon Jun 01 2009, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou-AT-u-psud.fr> wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
It looks like there were patches which got lost when we moved to trac/svn. Anyway, Oh ?
1) This is not a widely needed feature. 2) Breaking backwards compatibility is out of the question, IMO. 3) Preserving backwards compatibility increases the compile time cost of using mpl::pair.
So should we close this as wontfix ?
I guess that's up to Aleksey?
I've added a comment to the ticket asking the original submitter for clarification of the patch's original motivation (which is not clear to me). -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
participants (4)
-
Aleksey Gurtovoy -
David Abrahams -
Joel Falcou -
Steven Watanabe