MSVC opensource deployment.
This just showed up in my junk mail box. Vcpkg updates: Static linking is now available https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg With 90+ libraries in its catalog, Vcpkg makes it easier to find the right open source library for Visual C++ 2015. The latest update now supports static linking. This kind of interesting: a) Does this constitute and open-source source code deployment system that perhaps we might learn from/exploit? b) I'm intrigued with the comment under "License": "Code licensed under MIT License" Boost is in this repository - I don't remember changing the Boost license. Robert Ramey
Boost is in this repository - I don't remember changing the Boost license.
Boost is not in the repository. Code that goes and downloads boost for the end user is in the repository. https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg/blob/master/ports/boost/portfile.cmake Billy3 ________________________________ From: Boost <boost-bounces@lists.boost.org> on behalf of Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 10:08:58 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] MSVC opensource deployment. This just showed up in my junk mail box. Vcpkg updates: Static linking is now available https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%... With 90+ libraries in its catalog, Vcpkg makes it easier to find the right open source library for Visual C++ 2015. The latest update now supports static linking. This kind of interesting: a) Does this constitute and open-source source code deployment system that perhaps we might learn from/exploit? b) I'm intrigued with the comment under "License": "Code licensed under MIT License" Boost is in this repository - I don't remember changing the Boost license. Robert Ramey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.boost....
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
b) I'm intrigued with the comment under "License":
"Code licensed under MIT License"
Boost is in this repository - I don't remember changing the Boost license.
The actual Boost code isn't in the repo is it? I assume the MIT license is for vcpkg code itself. -- Olaf
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
This kind of interesting:
a) Does this constitute and open-source source code deployment system that perhaps we might learn from/exploit?
Partly.. As only the client, if I understand correctly, is open sourced. Not like the Conan (http://conan.io) which is fully open source including client and server. -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
+Robert There is no server component to open source. It downloads the boost tar.gz from sourceforge over standard HTTP. Billy3 ________________________________ From: Boost <boost-bounces@lists.boost.org> on behalf of Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:05:44 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] MSVC opensource deployment. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
This kind of interesting:
a) Does this constitute and open-source source code deployment system that perhaps we might learn from/exploit?
Partly.. As only the client, if I understand correctly, is open sourced. Not like the Conan (https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fconan.io&dat...) which is fully open source including client and server. -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Frobot-dreams... -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.boost....
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
This kind of interesting:
a) Does this constitute and open-source source code deployment system that perhaps we might learn from/exploit?
Partly.. As only the client, if I understand correctly, is open sourced. Not like the Conan (http://conan.io) which is fully open source including client and server.
vcpkg doesn't really use a server, does it? -- Olaf
participants (4)
-
Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) -
Olaf van der Spek -
Rene Rivera -
Robert Ramey