Request to review my GSoc Proposal[Boost multiprecision
Dear Sir/Ma'am, It would be great if you could review my GSOC proposal for [Boost multiprecision]: New Big-Double Backend Types Doc link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xznSxg1XcAiQMnVXSMG_NwxuUeGmkI5iXhabSXe_... I deeply regret and apologize for the late submission, but I request you to review it once as it will surely help me to update it in required ways. With regards Suyash Srivastava IIT(ISM) Dhanbad -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html
Dear Suyash, At a very very quick look, your proposal looks promising. Due to the tight scheduling today, my sincere advice is for you to submit your proposal. Please be sure to mark the draft as final before the deadline. Your proposal is solid and you seem like a capable applicant. So please do not delay to mark your proposal as final. You are a bit late, but if you submit as I think you should, you will be in the game. GSOC you know, It is a highly competitive selection process. Good luck and stay safe you and those you care for. We will consider your application as we consider all good applications. The deadline has not yet passed. Sent from my iPhone
On 30. Mar 2020, at 10:40, suyashtava via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Dear Sir/Ma'am, It would be great if you could review my GSOC proposal for [Boost multiprecision]: New Big-Double Backend Types
Doc link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xznSxg1XcAiQMnVXSMG_NwxuUeGmkI5iXhabSXe_...
I deeply regret and apologize for the late submission, but I request you to review it once as it will surely help me to update it in required ways.
With regards Suyash Srivastava IIT(ISM) Dhanbad
-- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Hi, I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been copied out from my proposal without my permission (especially in the part of previous work, e.g. "implemented a BigInteger class (and various number theoretic algorithms)" and in the milestones format). -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html
...certain parts in this proposal have been copied out from my> proposal without my permission (especially in the part of> previous work, e.g. "implemented a BigInteger class> (and various number theoretic algorithms)" I'm not sure if I found one of the exact passages beingmentioned, however, taken without context, I believethe passages mentioned (when taken out of context) seemto be similar in wording. It might be a coincidence. We will be looking at the entirecontent and the context of each application, also noting thetime of receiving the applications. I advise no big changes to the existing proposals at this time. Kind regards, Chris
On Tuesday, March 31, 2020, 2:58:12 AM GMT+2, dim131 via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote: Hi, I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been copied out from my proposal without my permission (especially in the part of previous work, e.g. "implemented a BigInteger class (and various number theoretic algorithms)" and in the milestones format). -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been copied out from my proposal without my permission
Can you share all the parts where you think the OP has copied? Because as Chris mentioned it could be a coincidence. In fact, it is quite ordinary for students to write a big integer class themselves as it is required in competitive programming which the OP says he does. I guess Number Theoretic algorithms also include GCD, Prime Sieve, Primality testing which again would have been implemented by any (competitive) programmer. For all the points you'll mention, OP *should* submit some proof dated prior to your submission of the proposal. -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html
I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been>> copied out from my proposal without my permission Can you share all the parts where you think the OP has copied?> Because as Chris mentioned it could be a coincidence. We could also handle the depths of the details of this discussionoff site, if that makes more sense? David Bellot and I and a few others have already had somelimited communication regarding potential details of thispotential phenomenon off site. Kind regards, Chris
On Wednesday, April 1, 2020, 12:40:53 AM GMT+2, madhur4127 via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote: Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been copied out from my proposal without my permission
Can you share all the parts where you think the OP has copied? Because as Chris mentioned it could be a coincidence. In fact, it is quite ordinary for students to write a big integer class themselves as it is required in competitive programming which the OP says he does. I guess Number Theoretic algorithms also include GCD, Prime Sieve, Primality testing which again would have been implemented by any (competitive) programmer. For all the points you'll mention, OP *should* submit some proof dated prior to your submission of the proposal. -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Hello dim131, I had gone through your proposal as a reference and I found the way of writing in milestone really nice. It could be the best way to demonstrate my workflow that's why opted it. And regarding the Biginteger class, I had implemented it on my own and had also provided the link for it. As I had taken look through your and many other proposals as well so their might be the case that writing style might feel similar, but as objected by you I had not made any big changes but had changed almost everything that might feel similar to yours. Though we are applying for different projects and I am sure that different projects requires different understanding, explanation and schedule, so it won't create any issue. Deep apologies to you if you found any of these things as wrong. With best regards Suyash Srivastava On 31 Mar 2020 06:27, dim131 via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote: Hi, I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been copied out from my proposal without my permission (especially in the part of previous work, e.g. "implemented a BigInteger class (and various number theoretic algorithms)" and in the milestones format). -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (5)
-
Christopher Kormanyos -
dim131 -
madhur4127 -
suyashtava -
suyashtava＠outlook.com