[mpl]iter_fold_if use of apply1 instead of iter_apply1 maybe bug?
The following code line: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/trunk/boost/mpl/iter_fold_if.hpp#L4... shows apply1<Predicate,Iterator>; however, shouldn't this be iter_apply1<Predicate,Iterators> because, just from the name, Iterator is an iterator and needs to be deref'ed. Also, the previous line: not_< is_same<Iterator,LastIterator> > further suggests that Iterator is actually an iterator. I know it works presently; however, I really don't understand why.
AMDG Larry Evans wrote:
The following code line:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/trunk/boost/mpl/iter_fold_if.hpp#L4...
shows apply1<Predicate,Iterator>; however, shouldn't this be iter_apply1<Predicate,Iterators> because, just from the name, Iterator is an iterator and needs to be deref'ed. Also, the previous line:
not_< is_same<Iterator,LastIterator> >
further suggests that Iterator is actually an iterator.
I know it works presently; however, I really don't understand why.
iter_fold isn't supposed to dereference the iterators. http://www.boost.org/libs/mpl/doc/refmanual/iter-fold.html In Christ, Steven Watanabe
participants (2)
-
Larry Evans -
Steven Watanabe