Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-05 21:16:39

#979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  sparent_at_[hidden]  |       Owner:  daniel_frey     
      Type:  Bugs               |      Status:  reopened        
 Milestone:  Boost 1.34.1       |   Component:  operators       
   Version:  release 1.34.0     |    Severity:  Optimization    
Resolution:                     |    Keywords:  operator library
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment (by witt):

 Replying to [comment:5 dave]:
 > I can't see how this is appropriate for 1.34.1

 It's a "simple" change, passes testing on HEAD and it won't delay 1.34.1
 even if we have to back it out again.

 > It's NAD, in my opinion, and should be put off until the next full
 release.

 If this were a commercial project I would agree. My experience is that a
 more opportunistic approach is required for boost.
 There is no way prioritizing changes when you can not prioritize work
 items.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/979#comment:7>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.