Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-05 21:16:39

#979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved
  Reporter: sparent_at_[hidden] | Owner: daniel_frey
      Type: Bugs | Status: reopened
 Milestone: Boost 1.34.1 | Component: operators
   Version: release 1.34.0 | Severity: Optimization
Resolution: | Keywords: operator library
Comment (by witt):

 Replying to [comment:5 dave]:
> I can't see how this is appropriate for 1.34.1

 It's a "simple" change, passes testing on HEAD and it won't delay 1.34.1
 even if we have to back it out again.

> It's NAD, in my opinion, and should be put off until the next full

 If this were a commercial project I would agree. My experience is that a
 more opportunistic approach is required for boost.
 There is no way prioritizing changes when you can not prioritize work

Ticket URL: <>
Boost C++ Libraries <>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:49:55 UTC