Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-06 00:47:33

#979: ::boost::detail::empty_base could be improved
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  sparent_at_[hidden]  |       Owner:  daniel_frey     
      Type:  Bugs               |      Status:  reopened        
 Milestone:  Boost 1.34.1       |   Component:  operators       
   Version:  release 1.34.0     |    Severity:  Optimization    
Resolution:                     |    Keywords:  operator library
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment (by anonymous):

 Replying to [comment:12 witt]:
 > Replying to [comment:11 dave]:
 >
 > I always assumed everything in {{{ boost::detail }}} is fair game.

 Well, it should be... but occasionally you see stuff like this:

 http://www.boost.org/libs/serialization/doc/archive_reference.html

 http://www.boost.org/libs/serialization/doc/derivation.html


 > Should we be more conservative?

 I don't think so.  Did
 http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/979#comment:11 lead you to think I
 would say otherwise.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/979#comment:13>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.