[Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1440: libs/config/test/link/Jamfile.v2 confuses process_jam_log

Subject: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1440: libs/config/test/link/Jamfile.v2 confuses process_jam_log
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-14 02:57:49

#1440: libs/config/test/link/Jamfile.v2 confuses process_jam_log
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  dave              |       Owner:  johnmaddock
     Type:  Bugs              |      Status:  new        
Milestone:  To Be Determined  |   Component:  None       
  Version:  Boost 1.34.1      |    Severity:  Problem    
 Keywords:                    |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 {{{
 [ERROR   ] # running checked system commands in /usr/local/src/boost-
 bitten/boost/status: ['"/usr/local/src/boost-
 bitten/tools_regression/build/bin/gcc-4.1.2/release/process_jam_log"
 "/usr/local/src/boost-bitten/results" <"/usr/local/src/boost-
 bitten/results/bjam.log"']
 [INFO    ] boost_root: /usr/local/src/boost-bitten/boost
 [ERROR   ] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [INFO    ] locate_root: /usr/local/src/boost-bitten/results
 [ERROR   ]   File "/usr/local/src/boost-bitten/run.py", line 52, in
 <module>
 [INFO    ] *****Error - No "boost-test" lines encountered.
 [ERROR   ]     runner(root)
 [INFO    ]      (Usually occurs when bjam was envoked without the --dump-
 tests option
 }}}

 Is there a reason that can't be a regular link test?  Does it have to be
 building a library?
 If the latter, can't we just make that library part of the requirements
 for a regular link test target?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1440>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.