Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1582: BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG is defined when it shouldn't be

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1582: BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG is defined when it shouldn't be
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-21 10:11:13


#1582: BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG is defined when it shouldn't be
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
  Reporter: steven_watanabe | Owner: johnmaddock
      Type: Bugs | Status: new
 Milestone: Boost 1.36.0 | Component: config
   Version: Boost Development Trunk | Severity: Problem
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by johnmaddock):

 I was under the impression that long long was always supported by gcc, but
 that it would emit warnings (rather a lot of them actually) if you
 actually use it under some circumstances. We have the typedef's
 boost::long_long_type and boost::ulong_long_type in boost/config.hpp which
 can be used without generation of the warnings.

 Otherwise what's the test case?

 Thanks, John.

--
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1582#comment:1>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:49:57 UTC