Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1582: BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG is defined when it shouldn't be

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1582: BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG is defined when it shouldn't be
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-21 10:11:13

#1582: BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG is defined when it shouldn't be
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
  Reporter:  steven_watanabe          |       Owner:  johnmaddock
      Type:  Bugs                     |      Status:  new        
 Milestone:  Boost 1.36.0             |   Component:  config     
   Version:  Boost Development Trunk  |    Severity:  Problem    
Resolution:                           |    Keywords:             
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by johnmaddock):

 I was under the impression that long long was always supported by gcc, but
 that it would emit warnings (rather a lot of them actually) if you
 actually use it under some circumstances.  We have the typedef's
 boost::long_long_type and boost::ulong_long_type in boost/config.hpp which
 can be used without generation of the warnings.

 Otherwise what's the test case?

 Thanks, John.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1582#comment:1>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.