Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #2009: suggested resiliency/ease-of-use
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-14 09:17:11
#2009: suggested resiliency/ease-of-use
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: dave | Owner: nesotto
Type: Feature Requests | Status: new
Milestone: Boost 1.36.0 | Component: range
Version: Boost 1.35.0 | Severity: Problem
Resolution: | Keywords:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by anonymous):
I could "fix" the code for range2 by adding one typedef:
struct range2
{
range2() {}
typedef char* iterator;
typedef iterator const_iterator; // this one added
char* begin() const { return 0; }
};
Is that good enough, or do you still think it is a big problem that two
versions of range_begin() needs to be defined?
-Thorsten
--
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2009#comment:1>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:49:58 UTC