Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #2009: suggested resiliency/ease-of-use

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #2009: suggested resiliency/ease-of-use
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-14 09:17:11

#2009: suggested resiliency/ease-of-use
  Reporter: dave | Owner: nesotto
      Type: Feature Requests | Status: new
 Milestone: Boost 1.36.0 | Component: range
   Version: Boost 1.35.0 | Severity: Problem
Resolution: | Keywords:
Comment (by anonymous):

 I could "fix" the code for range2 by adding one typedef:

   struct range2
       range2() {}

       typedef char* iterator;
       typedef iterator const_iterator; // this one added
       char* begin() const { return 0; }

 Is that good enough, or do you still think it is a big problem that two
 versions of range_begin() needs to be defined?


Ticket URL: <>
Boost C++ Libraries <>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:49:58 UTC