Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #1744: [getting started] No information on building static libraries with bjam under Windows
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-26 23:41:38
#1744: [getting started] No information on building static libraries with bjam
under Windows
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: tychom_at_[hidden] | Owner: grafik
Type: Bugs | Status: new
Milestone: Boost 1.36.0 | Component: Documentation
Version: Boost 1.35.0 | Severity: Problem
Resolution: | Keywords: bjam build static windows
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by dave):
Replying to [comment:12 grafik]:
> Replying to [comment:9 dave]:
> > Well, that's an embarrassment!
>
> To say the least :-(
>
> > What about
> >
> > * Change the single variant we build and the autolink code to be
consistent with the docs
> > * Change the single variant we build and the docs to be consistent
with the autolink code
> >
> > ?
>
> Because the `link=static` variant is not the most widely used one,
AFAIK. Note, I have no real personal opinion as to which one to default to
other than trying to satisfy the majority ;-)
Well, me neither. And since you happen to have some sense of what the
majority needs, I'd be happy to go with whichever your gut says is the
better bet... or even whichever one you think causes the least risk.
However, please consider that if we decide to change the docs, it would be
very desirable to avoid adding complexity (if possible).
--
Ticket URL: <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1744#comment:13>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:49:58 UTC