Subject: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #3859: [Boost.utility]
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-25 16:46:20
#3859: [Boost.utility]
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: achinkoff@⦠| Owner: no-maintainer
Type: Feature Requests | Status: new
Milestone: Boost 1.42.0 | Component: utility
Version: Boost 1.41.0 | Severity: Optimization
Keywords: |
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Having considered [http://www.research.ibm.com/designpatterns/pubs/ph-
jun96.txt]
I propose singleton implementation.
I had attached "singleton.hpp" to this letter.
Below is the test program:
{{{
#include <stdio.h>
#include <singleton.hpp>
class A : public boost::Singleton<A>
{
//
// Only Singleton class can create and delete us!
//
SINGLETON_IS_MY_FRIEND;
public:
void foo(){ printf("foo!\n"); }
A(){ printf("A()\n"); }
~A(){ printf("~A()\n"); }
};
void main()
{
// It is not compiled:
//A a = A::Instance();
// That is exactly as it should be used:
A::Instance().foo();
}
}}}
Test program outputs:
{{{
A()
foo!
~A()
}}}
I suggest include "singleton.hpp" into "utility.hpp" header that it can be
used along with: boost::noncopyable, etc.
-- Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3859> Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:02 UTC