Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #3859: [Boost.utility]

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #3859: [Boost.utility]
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-27 05:33:48

#3859: [Boost.utility]
  Reporter: achinkoff@… | Owner: no-maintainer
      Type: Feature Requests | Status: closed
 Milestone: Boost 1.42.0 | Component: utility
   Version: Boost 1.41.0 | Severity: Optimization
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
Changes (by steven_watanabe):

  * status: new => closed
  * resolution: => wontfix


 New libraries need to go through the review process. Getting singleton
 right generically is a lot less trivial than it might seem. I believe
 that one singleton library was rejected a while ago.

 A few other points.

  a. This doesn't conform to Boost naming conventions.
  b. Double checked locking is broken and this has been well known for
  c. BOOST_MPL_ASSERT almost always gives better error messages than hand
 crafted static assertions.

Ticket URL: <>
Boost C++ Libraries <>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:02 UTC