Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #5482: iterative_size() not the same for interval_maps using std::less and std::greater

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #5482: iterative_size() not the same for interval_maps using std::less and std::greater
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-17 09:53:38

#5482: iterative_size() not the same for interval_maps using std::less and
std::greater
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  boicotinho@…            |       Owner:  jofaber                      
      Type:  Bugs                    |      Status:  assigned                     
 Milestone:  Boost 1.47.0            |   Component:  ICL                          
   Version:  Boost 1.46.1            |    Severity:  Problem                      
Resolution:                          |    Keywords:  interval, iteration, ordering
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by anonymous):

 Replying to [comment:2 jofaber]:

 Thank you for looking into this -
 I really like this ICL of yours and use it a lot :)

 FYI It seems that your workaround works - but if
 I insert the intervals in another order for m2,
 then m2.find() fails while m1.find() still works.

 In the meanwhile I am using std::less but representing
 the data with negative numbers instead.

 The reason I wanted to use std::greater is because
 I would like find() to start from the highest interval
 given a range.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5482#comment:3>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.