Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #5406: Incorrection assumption of Intel C++ Composer for Windows behaviour for c++0x features

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #5406: Incorrection assumption of Intel C++ Composer for Windows behaviour for c++0x features
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-28 08:22:34


#5406: Incorrection assumption of Intel C++ Composer for Windows behaviour for
c++0x features
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
  Reporter: Edward Rankin <erankin@…> | Owner: johnmaddock
      Type: Bugs | Status: closed
 Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: config
   Version: Boost 1.46.1 | Severity: Problem
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------

Comment (by Edward Rankin <erankin@…>):

 I guess my main point for posting this ticket is that C++0x language
 support differs between VC++ and Intel C++, but the structure of the
 header file cannot support such differences.

 A good example is nullptr support. If boost starts using nullptr, VC++
 supports that keyword but not Intel C++.

 That's why my ticket title is not about scoped enum but about the
 assumption made in the logic of deciding what C++0x features the compiler
 supports.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5406#comment:2>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:06 UTC