Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #5406: Incorrection assumption of Intel C++ Composer for Windows behaviour for c++0x features
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-28 08:22:34
#5406: Incorrection assumption of Intel C++ Composer for Windows behaviour for
c++0x features
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: Edward Rankin <erankin@â¦> | Owner: johnmaddock
Type: Bugs | Status: closed
Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: config
Version: Boost 1.46.1 | Severity: Problem
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by Edward Rankin <erankin@â¦>):
I guess my main point for posting this ticket is that C++0x language
support differs between VC++ and Intel C++, but the structure of the
header file cannot support such differences.
A good example is nullptr support. If boost starts using nullptr, VC++
supports that keyword but not Intel C++.
That's why my ticket title is not about scoped enum but about the
assumption made in the logic of deciding what C++0x features the compiler
supports.
-- Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5406#comment:2> Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:06 UTC