Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #5752: boost::call_once() is unreliable on some platforms
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-17 21:35:34
#5752: boost::call_once() is unreliable on some platforms
----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@â¦> | Owner: viboes
Type: Bugs | Status: assigned
Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: thread
Version: Boost 1.47.0 | Severity: Problem
Resolution: | Keywords: once
----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by viboes):
* milestone: Boost 1.52.0 => To Be Determined
Comment:
Replying to [comment:16 fmhess]:
> Replying to [comment:15 viboes]:
> >
> > It seems then that I can not relay on whether SIG_ATOMIC_MAX is
defined or not, but I need a value to mean not-a-valid value. Have a
suggestion?
>
> How about using a boost::atomic<unsigned long> for the epoch?
I will try to use it when released. I can not depend on a non released
library.
-- Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5752#comment:17> Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:10 UTC