Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #6212: "Method 3.1: Implement a Range Adaptor without arguments" does not implement

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #6212: "Method 3.1: Implement a Range Adaptor without arguments" does not implement
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-02 07:34:39

#6212: "Method 3.1: Implement a Range Adaptor without arguments" does not
implement
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
  Reporter:  ne01026@…            |       Owner:  neilgroves
      Type:  Bugs                 |      Status:  new       
 Milestone:  To Be Determined     |   Component:  range     
   Version:  Boost 1.48.0         |    Severity:  Problem   
Resolution:                       |    Keywords:            
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by nathanridge):

 Replying to [comment:1 ne01026@…]:
 > I wonder why the explicit assignment is needed?  Or should it be a
 reference instead?

 It should not be a reference (it would be a reference to a temporary which
 will have died long before one tries to use it).

 Regarding why the explicit assignment is needed, see
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8092670/uninitialized-const. I believe


 {{{
     const detail::reverse_forwarder reversed = {};
 }}}


 also does the trick.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6212#comment:2>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.