Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #7899: Invalid URLs in container documentation
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-13 18:19:10
#7899: Invalid URLs in container documentation
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: alexey kutumov <alexey.kutumov@â¦> | Owner: danieljames
Type: Bugs | Status: new
Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: auto_index
Version: Boost 1.52.0 | Severity: Not Applicable
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Comment (by johnmaddock):
OK there seem to be a number of issues here, you're correct that
program_options doesn't validate as Boostbook. However, there are so many
errors that it's hard to know where to begin. I'm not sure if our DTD is
accurate enough to fully validate anyway? Either way I'll attach the
error log.
The other issue is that if I gut boost.xml so that the only library
included is the container docbook xml I still see errors from our XSL
code:
{{{
runtime error: file
file:///D:/data/boost/trunk/tools/boostbook/xsl/docbook.xsl line 436
element attribute
xsl:attribute: The QName 'rev:last-revision' has no namespace binding in
scope in the stylesheet; this is an error, since the namespace was not
specified by the instruction itself.
error: file src/boost.xml
xsltRunStylesheet : run failed
}}}
Do you have any ideas what that means and/or what the issue might be?
One possible hack (if it's possible) is to change the Boostbook XSL to
allow a reference to an external docbook file, which doesn't get included
at that point, but just outputs an xi:include so it's only processed at
the docbook->HTML stage.
Thoughts?
-- Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7899#comment:9> Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:12 UTC